What Is The Constructivist Paradigm

Below is result for What Is The Constructivist Paradigm in PDF format. You can download or read online all document for free, but please respect copyrighted ebooks. This site does not host PDF files, all document are the property of their respective owners.


constructivist views of learning have captured the current zeitgeist in today s educational arena. The term constructivism most probably is derived from Piaget s reference to his views as constructivist (Gruber & Voneche, 1977), as well as from Bruner s description of discovery learning as constuctionist (1966).

The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory

meaning. Here, we discuss the development of constructivist grounded theory from its beginnings in the work of Strauss and Corbin through to the work of sociologist Kathy Charmaz. Constructivism as a methodological imperative To ensure a strong research design, researchers must choose a research paradigm that is congruent with

Using Constructivist Case Study Methodology to Understand

constructivist grounded theory data analysis methods was used to develop a framework of community development from an occupational therapy perspective. Ten methodological questions are proposed regarding research question development, research paradigm, design and analysis, and trustworthiness.

Constructivist Approach for Teaching English: Making Sense of

Constructivist Approach for Teaching English: Making Sense of Paradigm Shift from the Traditional Approach Hemant Lata Sharma1, Poonam2 1Professor, Former Head & Dean, Faculty of Education, MDU, Rohtak, India 2Research Scholar, Department of Education, MDU, Rohtak, India

A Christian Constructivist? The Impact of Worldview on

constructivist paradigm. A second example is Lev Vygotsky. In his account of higher psychological processes of the human mind, he argued that we must recognize a zone of proximal development (cf. Vygotsky, 1978 and reviewed in Good, Mulryan, & McCaslin, 1992) indicating that range of potential thinking and reasoning an individual may accomplish

Constructivist Evaluation Checklist

Constructivist evaluation is that form of evaluation based on the propositions (basic assumptions) undergirding the constructivist paradigm. The constructivist paradigm differs from other knowledge paradigms commonly in use, including the scientific, the artistic, the religious, the legal, and others of similar broad sweep. It is based on three fundamental assumptions, which are commonly termed the ontological, epistemological, and methodological, viz:

Use of Constructivist Approach in Higher Education: An

Constructivist approach is one of them which aims at involving students in the process of learn-ing. The researcher used it at higher education level and found encouraging results to be disseminated through this paper. This paper is an account of researchers observation and reflects significance of using constructivist approach in higher educa-


The paradigm guiding this research is discussed bellow 4.2 RESEARCH PARADIGM A research paradigm intends to define approaches to social science research (Taber, 2013:287. The use of an interpretivist paradigm in this research is based on the belief that the participants become actively involved in all the phases of

Constructivist teaching methods

Constructivist teaching methods are based on constructivistlearning theory. Along with John Dewey, Jean Piaget researched childhood development and education. Their theories are now encompassed in the broader movement of progressive education. Constructivist learning theory says that all knowledge is constructed from a base of prior knowledge.

Constructivism, Strategic Culture, and the Iraq War

curity policies, as with the effort to replace the Cold War paradigm with the messianic Wilsonian option offered by neoconservatives in the run-up to the Iraq War. Constructivism and Strategic Culture The Constructivist Approach to Strategic Culture The first central proposition of the constructivist vision of strategic culture

Constructivist Pedagogy - Miami University

them in establishing constructivist classrooms. The major controversy at that point focused on the process of directly instructing teacher education students to use explicit step-by-step models of constructivist teaching. The method of teaching constructivism contradicted the learning paradigm inherent within the various models that the teacher

Constructivism (learning theory)

developed by Seymour Papert, inspired by constructivist and experiential learning ideas of Jean Piaget. Piaget's theory of constructivist learning has had wide ranging impact on learning theories and teaching methods in education and is an underlying theme of many education reform movements.

Applicability of Constructivist Theory in Qualitative

dominant constructivist view focuses on the cultural embeddedness of learning, employing the methods and framework of cultural anthropology to examine how learning and cognition are distributed in the environment rather than stored in the head of an individual (Duffy 2006:11). Constructivism is a theory of knowledge

Assessment Practices in Constructivist Paradigm at the Higher

Dr. Vijayshri Bhati Assessment Practices in Constructivist Paradigm at the Higher Secondary Level in Delhi 95 affective domains. 5. A scientific system of grading is demanded in this century, which removes the minute discriminations among the learners and this helps to make assessment on criterion basis and

Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for

the phenomena. Thus, constructivist research is shaped from the bottom up, i.e., from individual perspectives, to broad patterns, and ultimately to broad understandings (Creswell and Clark2011). If we situate postpositivist and constructivist research on a paradigm continuum, they will be anchored on its two opposite ends (Betzner2008).

Chapter 8: Applying the constructivist research design

Chapter 8: Applying the constructivist research design This research was inspired by Guba and Lincoln s (1985) conception of Naturalistic Inquiry and Charmaz s (2006) constructivist conception of Grounded Theory. The rationale for the various research design decisions was indicated in the previous chapter.


4.2 Science Teachers Constructivist Beliefs and Practices 56 4.2.1 Constructivist versus Traditional 56 4.2.2 Bloom-Constructivist Relation in Science 58 4.2.3 Teacher s role during Constructivist Learning Assessment for Learning 60


But what constitutes a paradigm, in this context? A paradigm consists of four parts: ontology, epistemology, methodology, and methods. Ontology is concerned with the nature of existence (Crotty, 1998: 3) which Grix (2004) considers as the departure point of all research.

Research in Constructivist Frameworks Using Ethnographic

constructivist paradigm specifi cally before detailing ethnographic method and techniques and providing examples from the author s work. Philosophical Traditions of Research in the Social Sciences In the broader context of research theory in the social sciences, there are

Philosophical Paradigms, Grounded Theory, and Perspectives on

fitting within the postpositivist paradigm, Charmaz s (2006) version fitting with the constructionist paradigm, and Corbin and Strauss s (2008) version fitting with the interpretivist paradigm. The focus of this discussion is the distinction at the paradigm level and how this influences the conception of emergence.

A Motivational View of Constructivist- informed Teaching

is the dominant paradigm of learning in science, and a huge amount of science education research has been carried out from a constructivist perspective. However, the question of how to implement classroom teaching that is consistent with a constructivist view of learning is still an issue of concern. Over the past two decades,

Scientific Research Paradigms in Social Sciences

In Guba s (1990) classification, postpositivist paradigm has been discussed as a separate paradigm and a quartet classification (positivist, postpositivist, constructivist, and critical) has been made by differentiating in the aspects of ontology, epistemology, methodology.

Constructivist Paradigms: Implications for Strategy as

constructivist paradigms as opportunities for ques-tioning established research paradigms, while intro-ducing alternative paradigmatic orientations. Concern 1. The constructivist programmes ques-tion a concept of reality as something that is objectively given , instead focusing on the construction processes implied in the creation,

Constructivism in Science Classroom: Why and How

There is paradigm shift in traditional role of teacher as well as students in constructivist science classroom. The teaching methods used in traditional classroom is based on objectivist view of knowledge which is grounded on the assumption that knowledge is objective, universal and complete and can be

The realist/constructivist paradigm: U.S. foreign policy

The realist/constructivist paradigm: U.S. foreign policy towards Pakistan and India 3 and one where universal moral laws cannot be applied to the State. Realist diktats maintain that necessity and reason triumph over morality and ethics. The fundamental unit‟ of social and political affairs is the conflict group‟, where men

The realist/constructivist paradigm : U.S. foreign policy

The realist/constructivist paradigm: U.S. foreign policy towards Pakistan and India 25 foreign policy analysis; Section II is an overview of U.S. foreign relations with Pakistan from the partition (1947) till the presidency of George H. Bush, concluding with the present foreign policy of President Obama (Section IV).


constructivist teachers encourage students to constantly assess how the activity is helping them gain understanding. Keywords: Constructivism, Learning theory, Paradigm, Teaching and Learning.


Constructivist aradigms P Constructi vism is not a homogenous paradigm. Various strands of empirical insights and philosophical re ections have led (and are still leading) to the formulations of a number of constructivisms. Vincent Kenny ( 2010 ) speaks of ever branching new sub-disciplines.

Interpretivism-Constructivism as a Research Method in the

by way of methodological justification: ―The/an interpretivist-constructivist method was applied/followed‖, as if this statement were fully self-explanatory. In other cases, authors (in this case, an educationist) would elaborate as follows: An interpretivist-constructivist approach was applied as hermeneutic instrument, an


CONSTRUCTIVISM: TOWARDS A PARADIGM SHIFT IN CLASSROOM TEACHING & LEARNING Shazli Hasan Khan, Ph. D. Assistant Professor, MANUU, CTE, Sambhal Constructivism is a theory of Knowledge, a philosophy of learning. Its proponents include Piaget, Vygotsky and later-day philosopher Glasersfeld. The constructivist philosophy has been adopted in

Beyond constructivism: Exploring future learning paradigms

Constructivism refers to learning as the construction of new meanings (knowledge) by the learner him/herself. Social constructivism refers to learning as the result of active participation in a community where new meanings are co-constructed by the learner and his/her community and knowledge is the result of consensus (Gruender, 1996; Savery & Duffy, 1995).


constructivist paradigm, as they articulate it, is unclear about the relationship between constructed realities and the original givenness of the cosmos, and that a worldview based on participation and participative realities is more helpful and satisfying. We start from and extend the Guba and Lincoln framework to articulate a participatory


Constructivism studied as a basic paradigm in this study. In this context, the answers to the following questions were sought: 1. How does the number of publications change on the constructivist approach as a paradigm? 1.1. How does the number of publications about constructivist approach in scientific indexes change between 2000-2016?

Global Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences Vol 4

paradigm whose mother is the interpretivist paradigm of philosophy. It seeks to explain in detail the meaning of the constructivism paradigm, describing its unique features while discussing vividly how this ever growing philosophical approach is gaining popularity in the fields of research as well as teaching and learning.

The Constructivist Paradigm

Pedigree of the Critical Theory Paradigm Ø Distinguishing characteristics: pCritical of established theories/paradigms pCritical of problem-solving theory pCritical of rational choice and positivism in general pNeither rooted in politics as the realist and liberal paradigms are, nor in economics as the radical paradigm is, but in sociology. 2

An Introduction to Research

An Introduction to Research Life is complex; the world is not perfect. Many different kinds of people live on this planet, and educators and psychologists do not know the best ways to educate

Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and

constructivist learning environments and six benefits of constructivism were outlined in this article. Significant differences between traditional classroom and constructivist classroom were spelt out in a tabular form. Furthermore,principles of constructivism and several implications of constructivism for teaching and

What is constructionism, and what does it

What is constructionism, and what does it have to do with Piaget? Constructionism is a theory of education developed by Seymour Papert of M.I.T.1).


point stressed in the constructivist paradigm is that the learner occupies the top position rather than the teacher. The learner gains by interaction with his or her own environment, and in doing so understands his/her own characteristics and perspectives. The learner constructs his own designs and finds his own solutions to problems and behaves autonomous and independent. According to constructivists, learning is a result of individual meta construction.